Source: EOIR — Find an Immigration Court.
Recording an internet-based hearing is prohibited (8 C.F.R. § 1003.28). Respondents without a representative default to in-person hearings.
Background
The Honorable Immigration Judge Anupriya Krishna earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2004 from The Ohio State University, a Juris Doctor in 2007 from Cleveland State University, and a Master of Laws in 2012 from George Washington University. Before her appointment, she served in roles with the Executive Office for Immigration Review and as an attorney advisor with the Social Security Administration.
Caseload & process (since 2021)
69
Completions per year
208 total
1%
Detained at decision
share of cases
26.9 mo
Median time to decision
from case start
53.7%
Ordered removed in absentia
person absent
16.8%
Decisions appealed to BIA
appeal rate
—
Appeals remanded or reversed
only 0 appeals — too few
Grant rates by type of relief
Share granted among merits decisions for each application type, since 2021.
Asylum
0%
51 decisions Moderate
Withholding / CAT
4.6%
108 decisions Moderate
Cancellation — 42B (non-LPR)
0%⚠
1 decision Too few cases
Voluntary departure
92.3%⚠
13 decisions Too few cases
0%
of asylum claims granted on the merits Moderate
Based on 51 asylum decisions (grants + denials) since 2021.
This judge
0%
This court
26.2%
National average
31.8%
0%100% granted
In the bottom 1% of the 825 judges nationally with enough cases to compare.
Does a lawyer matter here?
Asylum grant rate by whether the person had legal representation.
With a lawyer⚠represented · 32 decisions since 2021
0%
Without a lawyer⚠unrepresented · 19 decisions since 2021
0%
Asylum grant rate over time
Each point is that calendar year's grant rate, back to 2015 where the judge was deciding cases — the longer career view. Dashed grey line = current national average (31.8%). Headline rates above use 2021 – today.
* 2026 is a partial year (data through 06/01/2026) and is incomplete.
Courts where this judge has decided cases
Hearing locations for cases this judge completed since 2021, by number of decisions.
Many judges hear cases from more than one court (detained facilities, video dockets, or reassignments).